hn-classics/_stories/2005/10423919.md

20 KiB
Raw Blame History

Source

Secret Code in Color Printers Lets Government Track You | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Skip to main content

Search


Email updates on news, actions,
and events in your area.

Join EFF Lists

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Donate

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Search

Secret Code in Color Printers Lets Government Track You

Tiny Dots Show Where and When You Made Your Print

PRESS RELEASE

Press Release

October 16, 2005

Share It Share on Twitter__ Share on Facebook__ Share on Google+__ Copy link__

Press Releases

All archives

Secret Code in Color Printers Lets Government Track You

Share It Share on Twitter__ Share on Facebook__ Share on Google+__ Copy link__

Tiny Dots Show Where and When You Made Your Print

San Francisco - A research team led by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) recently broke the code behind tiny tracking dots that some color laser printers secretly hide in every document.

The U.S. Secret Service admitted that the tracking information is part of a deal struck with selected color laser printer manufacturers, ostensibly to identify counterfeiters. However, the nature of the private information encoded in each document was not previously known.

"We've found that the dots from at least one line of printers encode the date and time your document was printed, as well as the serial number of the printer," said EFF Staff Technologist Seth David Schoen.

You can see the dots on color prints from machines made by Xerox, Canon, and other manufacturers (for a list of the printers we investigated so far, see: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/list.php). The dots are yellow, less than one millimeter in diameter, and are typically repeated over each page of a document. In order to see the pattern, you need a blue light, a magnifying glass, or a microscope (for instructions on how to see the dots, see: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/).

EFF and its partners began its project to break the printer code with the Xerox DocuColor line. Researchers Schoen, EFF intern Robert Lee, and volunteers Patrick Murphy and Joel Alwen compared dots from test pages sent in by EFF supporters, noting similarities and differences in their arrangement, and then found a simple way to read the pattern.

"So far, we've only broken the code for Xerox DocuColor printers," said Schoen. "But we believe that other models from other manufacturers include the same personally identifiable information in their tracking dots."

You can decode your own Xerox DocuColor prints using EFF's automated program at http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/index.php#program.

Xerox previously admitted that it provided these tracking dots to the government, but indicated that only the Secret Service had the ability to read the code. The Secret Service maintains that it only uses the information for criminal counterfeit investigations. However, there are no laws to prevent the government from abusing this information.

"Underground democracy movements that produce political or religious pamphlets and flyers, like the Russian samizdat of the 1980s, will always need the anonymity of simple paper documents, but this technology makes it easier for governments to find dissenters," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Lee Tien. "Even worse, it shows how the government and private industry make backroom deals to weaken our privacy by compromising everyday equipment like printers. The logical next question is: what other deals have been or are being made to ensure that our technology rats on us?"

EFF is still working on cracking the codes from other printers and we need the public's help. Find out how you can make your own test pages to be included in our research at http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/wp.php#testsheets.

Contact:

Seth Schoen
Staff Technologist
Electronic Frontier Foundation
seth@eff.org

Privacy

Printer Tracking

Share It Share on Twitter__ Share on Facebook__ Share on Google+__ Copy link__

Join EFF Lists

Join Our Newsletter!

Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more.

Email Address

Postal Code (optional)

Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link.

Oops something is broken right now, please try again later.

Deeplinks Blog by Alan Toner | February 15, 2018

The False Teeth of Chrome's Ad Filter

Today Google launched a new version of its Chrome browser with what they call an "ad filter"—which means that it sometimes blocks ads but is not an "ad blocker." EFF welcomes the elimination of the worst ad formats. But Google's approach here is a band-aid response to the crisis of...

Deeplinks Blog by India McKinney | February 15, 2018

Customs and Border Protection's Biometric Data Snooping Goes Too Far

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Privacy Office, and Office of Field Operations recently invited privacy stakeholders—including EFF and the ACLU of Northern California—to participate in a briefing and update on how the CBP is implementing its Biometric Entry/Exit Program. As we've written ...

Facial Recognition Banner

Press Release | February 15, 2018

Law Enforcement Use of Face Recognition Systems Threatens Civil Liberties, Disproportionately Affects People of Color: EFF Report

San Francisco, California—Face recognition—fast becoming law enforcement's surveillance tool of choice—is being implemented with little oversight or privacy protections, leading to faulty systems that will disproportionately impact people of color and may implicate innocent people for crimes they didn't commit, says an Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) ...

Deeplinks Blog by Ernesto Falcon, Katharine Trendacosta | February 12, 2018

Oregon Steps Up to the Plate on Network Neutrality This Month

****It should not be surprising that arguably the biggest mistake in Internet policy history is going to invoke a vast political response. Since the FCC repealed federal Open Internet Order in December, many states have attempted to fill the void. With a new bill that reinstates net neutrality protections, Oregon...

Border Field State Park / Imperial Beach, San Diego, California by Tony Webster

Deeplinks Blog by Adam Schwartz | February 3, 2018

Keep Border Spy Tech Out of Dreamer Protection Bills

UPDATE Feb. 14, 2018: Today, President Trump _endorsed Sen. Grassley's bill on border and immigration issues (_H.R. 2579). EFF opposes it. Like many of its predecessors, this bill would expand invasive surveillance on Americans and foreigners alike, with biometric screening, social media snooping, drones, and automatic license plates...

Deeplinks Blog by Andrew Crocker, David Ruiz | February 1, 2018

How Congress's Extension of Section 702 May Expand the NSA's Warrantless Surveillance Authority

Last month, Congress reauthorized Section 702, the controversial law the NSA uses to conduct some of its most invasive electronic surveillance. With Section 702 set to expire, Congress had a golden opportunity to fix the worst flaws in the NSA's surveillance programs and protect Americans' Fourth Amendment rights...

Deeplinks Blog by David Ruiz | January 31, 2018

The State of the Union: What Wasn't Said

President Donald Trump's first State of the Union address last night was remarkable for two reasons: for what he said, and for what he didn't say. The president took enormous pride last night in claiming to have helped "extinguish ISIS from the face of the Earth." But he failed to...

Deeplinks Blog by Jennifer Lynch, Karen Gullo | January 31, 2018

EFF Asks California Court to Reverse Ruling That Could Weaken Open Records Rules, Impede Public Access to Government Records

State agencies in California are collecting and using more data now than they ever, and much of this data includes very personal information about California residents. This presents a challenge for agencies and the courts—how to make government-held data that's indisputably of...

Quien Defiende Tus Datos

Deeplinks Blog by Katitza Rodriguez | January 30, 2018

ETICAS Releases First Ever Evaluations of Spanish Internet Companies' Privacy and Transparency Practices

It's Spain's turn to take a closer look at the practices of their local Internet companies, and how they treat their customers' personal data. Spain's ¿Quien Defiende Tus Datos? (Who Defends Your Data?) is a project of ETICAS Foundation, and is part of a region-wide initiative by leading...

Quien Defiende Tus Datos

Deeplinks Blog by Katitza Rodriguez | January 30, 2018

ETICAS Releases First Ever Evaluations of Spanish Internet Companies' Privacy and Transparency Practices

It's Spain's turn to take a closer look at the practices of their local Internet companies, and how they treat their customers' personal data. Spain's ¿Quien Defiende Tus Datos? (Who Defends Your Data?) is a project of ETICAS Foundation, and is part of a region-wide initiative by leading...

Pages

EFF Home

The leading nonprofit defending digital privacy, free speech, and innovation.

Follow EFF:

Contact

About

Issues

Updates

Press

Donate

JavaScript license information