122 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
122 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
created_at: '2014-03-26T04:15:37.000Z'
|
||
title: Why Apple Will Never Make Printers Again (2009)
|
||
url: http://www.macworld.com/article/1144929/apple_printers.html
|
||
author: d99kris
|
||
points: 47
|
||
story_text: ''
|
||
comment_text:
|
||
num_comments: 34
|
||
story_id:
|
||
story_title:
|
||
story_url:
|
||
parent_id:
|
||
created_at_i: 1395807337
|
||
_tags:
|
||
- story
|
||
- author_d99kris
|
||
- story_7471550
|
||
objectID: '7471550'
|
||
year: 2009
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
Apple improved music players with the iPod, and revolutionized the cell
|
||
phone with the iPhone. So why shouldn’t it do the same thing with
|
||
printers?
|
||
|
||
That’s the question a Macworld editor put to me when describing the
|
||
[slideshow look at Apple-built printers over the
|
||
years](http://www.macworld.com/article/144736/2009/12/appleprinters.html).
|
||
I’m not sure if the editor was joking, but it took me a while to stop
|
||
laughing before I could remind him why some things are better left in
|
||
the past.
|
||
|
||
Frankly, there’s no money in printers, only in printer supplies—and you
|
||
can only get that revenue if you make the printing engine. Apple never
|
||
did.
|
||
|
||
As discussed in this [overview of Apple’s printer
|
||
business](http://www.macworld.com/article/144880/2009/12/five_important_printers.html),
|
||
the company sold printers throughout the 1980s and 1990s because it
|
||
needed to be sure that high-quality printers were available for its
|
||
computers. You may forget that the “Windows monopoly” didn’t really
|
||
consolidate until around 1995-1996. In the ’80s there were lots of
|
||
computer makers; in the early ’90s, the operating systems were so
|
||
fragmented that every application supported its own graphic printer
|
||
drivers. Consider yourself lucky if you don’t remember the days when PC
|
||
owners had to check every application to see if it was compatible with
|
||
their particular printer.
|
||
|
||
Graphical operating systems with their own printer drivers helped
|
||
reverse that trend, but far more gradually than you may realize. The
|
||
Classic Mac OS had no “printing architecture.” Each printer driver
|
||
implemented everything, from the ground up, including figuring out how
|
||
to emulate every hack that every application had used to get better
|
||
results from the ImageWriter and LaserWriter drivers. (My favorite:
|
||
Until about 1998, unless printer drivers set a specific address to
|
||
non-zero while the Finder was printing, the Finder refused to print
|
||
icons.) QuickDraw GX hoped to change that, but died under pressure from
|
||
application developers who didn’t want to rewrite their printing code.
|
||
|
||
By the late 1980s, HP and some other innovative printing vendors had
|
||
done the thankless work of figuring this out; they started shipping
|
||
their own Mac printer drivers. By the time Steve Jobs returned to Apple,
|
||
there were plenty of high-quality Mac-compatible printers available from
|
||
a wide variety of manufacturers. When the company had to winnow projects
|
||
to focus on the basics, lower-margin printers were an easy cut to make.
|
||
|
||
If you long for the days of Apple printer innovation, you should know
|
||
that Apple never made its own printing technology. The print heads in
|
||
its dot matrix printers came from C. Itoh; the inkjet engines from Canon
|
||
or HP; the laser engines from Canon or Fuji-Xerox. Early on, Apple built
|
||
some printers itself with OEM parts, but by the end, StyleWriters were
|
||
merely rebranded HP printers built with Apple’s logo. The innovation, at
|
||
the time, was in the drivers. Thanks to CUPS in Mac OS X, printer
|
||
drivers are no longer nearly the black art they used to be. There’s
|
||
finally a real printing architecture open to everyone.
|
||
|
||
That’s all background to the main point—there’s no money in printers.
|
||
Macworld’s own comparison pricing site lists a 4800-by-1200-DPI color HP
|
||
DeskJet printer, capable of 20 pages per minute, available new for [as
|
||
low as
|
||
$30](http://macbuy.macworld.com/search_getprod.php?masterid=740315673).
|
||
[HP’s annual
|
||
report](http://www.corporate-ir.net/seccapsule/seccapsule.asp?m=f&c=71087&fid=6045810&dc=)
|
||
says that the money in printing is in supplies—some specialty papers,
|
||
but mostly ink and toner. [Lexmark’s SEC
|
||
filings](http://investor.lexmark.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=92369&p=irol-SEC_other)
|
||
describe no fewer than six restructuring programs since 2006 and detail
|
||
the company’s efforts to focus its products on “high-usage” markets—the
|
||
ones that consume the most supplies.
|
||
|
||
Printer companies have been trying to protect the fat margins on their
|
||
printer supplies with everything up to and including smart chips that
|
||
only accept digitally signed supplies, leading to lots of lawsuits and
|
||
consumer enmity. And those margins remain under pressure as consumers
|
||
look for lower-cost ink, with new services such as [Costco’s on-site
|
||
inkjet cartridge refill service](http://www.costcoinkjetrefill.com/)
|
||
emerging to put even more of a squeeze on printer manufacturers.
|
||
|
||
Even if you want to ignore those problems, you’d still face the dozens
|
||
of extra parts Apple would have to add, stock, and track for supplying
|
||
and servicing any printers it made. Apple’s retail stores would need
|
||
additional repair space and staffing. And printers introduce a large
|
||
class of technical support problems that Apple currently avoids. And
|
||
after all that, unless Apple made the print engine, it wouldn’t make the
|
||
ink, and that’s where all the money is.
|
||
|
||
There are hundreds of printers available to today’s Mac users at no cost
|
||
to Apple, and no money to be made by competing with them. Unless Apple
|
||
has a game-changing printing technology hidden in its labs somewhere—and
|
||
there’s no indication that it does—then printing is a game Apple can’t
|
||
beat. The only winning move is not to play.
|
||
|
||
\[Matt Deatherage is the publisher of [MDJ and
|
||
MWJ](http://macjournals.com/), journals for serious Macintosh users. He
|
||
saw the innards of the classic Mac OS “printing manager” in a previous
|
||
life and has yet to fully recover.\]
|
||
|
||
To comment on this article and other Macworld content, visit our
|
||
[Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/Macworld/) page or our
|
||
[Twitter](https://twitter.com/macworld) feed.
|