19 KiB
| created_at | title | url | author | points | story_text | comment_text | num_comments | story_id | story_title | story_url | parent_id | created_at_i | _tags | objectID | year | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-08-09T18:27:27.000Z | Nissan vs. Nissan (2008) | http://www.digest.com/Big_Story.php | dsr12 | 48 | 21 | 1439144847 |
|
10030968 | 2008 |
Nissan Motor vs. Nissan Computer - Digest.com
| ----- | |
| | | 
|
|
| 
| 
|
| 
| |
|
| Sponsored By: Internet For The People Committee | 9:24 am Feb 23, 2018 |
|
| ----- | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| **People's Opinions** |
| [**Read the words of
over 10,000 people
who already voiced
their opinion
regarding this
Nissan vs. Nissan
Lawsuit]12**
Go To Page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 page 51 page 52 page 53 page 54 page 55 page 56 page 57 page 58 page 59 page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 page 110 page 111 page 112 page 113 page 114 page 115 page 116 page 117 page 118 page 119 page 120 page 121 page 122 page 123 page 124 page 125 page 126 page 127 page 128 page 129 page 130 page 131 page 132 page 133 page 134 page 135 page 136 page 137 page 138 page 139 page 140 page 141 page 142 page 143 page 144 page 145 page 146 page 147 page 148 page 149 page 150 page 151 page 152 page 153 page 154 page 155 page 156 page 157 page 158 page 159 page 160 page 161 page 162 page 163 page 164 page 165 page 166 page 167 page 168 page 169 page 170 page 171 page 172 page 173 page 174 page 175 page 176 page 177 page 178 page 179 page 180 page 181 page 182 page 183 page 184 page 185 page 186 page 187 page 188 page 189 page 190 page 191 page 192 page 193 page 194 page 195 page 196 page 197 page 198 page 199 page 200 page 201 page 202 page 203 page 204 page 205 page 206 page 207 page 208 page 209 page 210 page 211 page 212 page 213 page 214 page 215 page 216 page 217 page 218 page 219 page 220 page 221 page 222 page 223 page 224 page 225 page 226 page 227 page 228 page 229 page 230 page 231 page 232 page 233 page 234 page 235 page 236 page 237 page 238 page 239 page 240 page 241 page 242 page 243 page 244 page 245 page 246 page 247 page 248 page 249 page 250 page 251 page 252 page 253 page 254 page 255 page 256 page 257 page 258 page 259 page 260 page 261 page 262 page 263 page 264 page 265 page 266 page 267 page 268 page 269 page 270 page 271 page 272 page 273 page 274 page 275 page 276 page 277 page 278 page 279 page 280 page 281 page 282 page 283 page 284 page 285 page 286 page 287 page 288 page 289 page 290 page 291 page 292 page 293 page 294 page 295 page 296 page 297 page 298 page 299 page 300 page 301 page 302 page 303 page 304 page 305 page 306 page 307 page 308 page 309 page 310 page 311 page 312 page 313 page 314 page 315 page 316 page 317 page 318 page 319 page 320 page 321 page 322 page 323 page 324 page 325 page 326 page 327 page 328 page 329 page 330 page 331 page 332 page 333 page 334 page 335 page 336 page 337 page 338 page 339 page 340 page 341 page 342 page 343 page 344 page 345 page 346 page 347 page 348 page 349 page 350 page 351 page 352 page 353 page 354 page 355 page 356 page 357 page 358 page 359 page 360 page 361 page 362 page 363 page 364 page 365 page 366 page 367 page 368 page 369 page 370 page 371 page 372 page 373 page 374 page 375 page 376 page 377 page 378 page 379 page 380 page 381 page 382 page 383 page 384 page 385 page 386 page 387 page 388 page 389 page 390 page 391 page 392 page 393 page 394 page 395 page 396 page 397 page 398 page 399 page 400 page 401 page 402 page 403 page 404 page 405 page 406 page 407 page 408 page 409 page 410 page 411 page 412 page 413 page 414 page 415 page 416 page 417 page 418 page 419 page 420 page 421 page 422 page 423 page 424 page 425 page 426 page 427 page 428 page 429 page 430 page 431 page 432 page 433 page 434 page 435 page 436 page 437 page 438 page 439 page 440 page 441 page 442 page 443 page 444 page 445 page 446 page 447 page 448 page 449 page 450 page 451 page 452 page 453 page 454 page 455 page 456 page 457 page 458 page 459 page 460 page 461 page 462 page 463 page 464 page 465 page 466 page 467 page 468 page 469 page 470 page 471 page 472 page 473 page 474 page 475 page 476 page 477 page 478 page 479 page 480 page 481 page 482 page 483 page 484 page 485 page 486 page 487 page 488 page 489 page 490 page 491 page 492 page 493 page 494 page 495 page 496 page 497 page 498 page 499 page 500 page 501 page 502 page 503 page 504 page 505 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| **Nissan Motor's French Connection** |
| **The French automaker Renault holds a 44.4% controlling interest
in Nissan Motor.** | | | |
| **15% of the French automaker Renault, is in the hands of the French government** |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| **Take A Stand And Make A Difference ** |
| **"[We The People" have
the power to rise
against such giants,
to guard and preserve
our constitutional rights, for us, for
our children and for
our grandchildren]14** | | | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| **Contact the Media** |
| **Public attention to this type of corporate behavior is most important.** | | | |
| **Cast your powerful voice and let the media know where you stand on these issues.** |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| **Display The
Bumper Sticker** |
| [**Let's Bring
TO LIGHT
What the Media
WILL NOT]16** | | | |
| 
|
| 
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| **Donations** |
| **Our cause cannot be sustained without your financial support. Please contribute. ** | | | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| **Contact The Parties** |
| **Voice your opinion and let the parties hear know how you feel in regards to this unacceptable corporate behavior. ** | | | |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| ----- | |
| Nissan vs. Nissan | |
|
|
Nissan Motor Sued Nissan Computer For Trademark Infringement,
Trademark Dilution And Cyber-Squatting
Seeking 10 Million Dollars In Damages | | | |
|
| |
| **_
By Uzi Nissan _-**** **founder and president, Nissan Computer Corp. **
** _BACKGROUND _
** My name is Uzi Nissan. I was born in Jerusalem - Israel. My father's last name was Nissan, his father's last name was Nissan, and so on. Nissan is a biblical term identifying the seventh month in the Hebrew calendar. The term Nissan also is Arabic for the month of April. **
Click here for supporting articles
**
I came to the US in 1976, and have used my surname for years to identify a number of business enterprises. The first was ** "Nissan Foreign Car" in 1980. When I operated this business, I serviced different makes and models of foreign cars, including cars manufactured by Nissan Motor, back then known as ** "DATSUN". Contrary to the allegations by Nissan Motor, I did not choose to use my last name "Nissan" for my business in 1980 because of their name. At that time, they and their automobiles were known as ** "DATSUN" and were not known as "Nissan". **
Click here for supporting articles _
_**
In December 1987, I started an import/export business known as ** "Nissan International"** At that time, Nissan Motor was not well known as Nissan, but primarily as ** "DATSUN". As with the earlier business, I chose to use Nissan in my business name because it was my last name. **
Click here for supporting articles
**
On May 14, 1991, ** "Nissan Computer Corp" was incorporated in the state of North Carolina. I was then, and still am, the company President. I have used Nissan as part of my trade name in connection with the sale of computer hardware, computer maintenance, networking, computer training and other consulting services related to computers. On June 4, 1994, I registered the domain name ** "nissan.com" ** and created a web site to promote computer related products and services on the Internet.
In July of 1995, I obtained a service mark registration for Nissan and my logo from the State of North Carolina. **
Click here for supporting articles
**On March 17, 1996, I registered the domain name ** "nissan.net" **, and began offering Internet services, including dial-up connections and direct data connections to business.
In another example of Nissan Motor's flexing its corporate might, age old eminent domain laws have been rewritten in Mississippi allowing the State to take land and homes from local landowners for the sole private benefit of Nissan Motor. How the State of Mississippi was "convinced" to change these laws is unclear, but it is clear that local individuals are being deprived of their property rights so Nissan Motor can build its own plant. **
Click here for supporting articles
** UPDATES
**
_DECEMBER - 1999, Initial Filing.
_ ** More then five years after I registered nissan.com, legal action was instituted by Nissan Motor seeking **$10,000,000 ** in damages, and to restrain me from the use of MY family name for business purposes on the Internet.
**_APRIL - 2002, First Round of Summary Judgments.
_**The court ruled on a summary judgment motions as follows:
1. "Cyber-Squatting" claim, in Nissan Computer's favor.
2. "Infringement on non-auto-related" claim, in Nissan Computer's favor.
3. "Infringement on auto-related" claim, in Nissan Motor's favor.
4. "Dilution" claim was sent to trial.
Nissan Motor's intention to make this case as expensive as possible for me was evident from the beginning. Undoubtedly, the notion that my company and me might be forced into bankruptcy rather than fight for my name, given the great expense, must have been a consideration. As if the financial burden incurred by me and Nissan Computers was not enough, Nissan Motor filed a lawsuit against the Internet Center, Inc., a corporation with three shareholders, in which I am the majority shareholder. The Internet Center, Inc. did not and does not utilize the word "NISSAN" in any way.
**_SEPTEMBER - 2002, Second Round of Summary Judgment.
_**The previous court rulings did not end this case. Nissan Motor filed a second round of Summary Judgment Motions, trying (and has been successful) to get the Court to deprive me of the right to a jury trial.
The Court, surprisingly, changed its attitude on this issue and:
1. Changed the relevant date for "fame" from 1991 to 1994.
2. Found that no reasonable jury could find that Nissan was not famous by 1994.
3. Found that Nissan Computer diluted Nissan Motor's trademark.
4. Found that the publication of information about this lawsuit, the comments
made by many people on this site and my efforts to bring this issue to
the public, actually tarnished Nissan Motor's trademark.
Many legal experts view this case, not as a "law-breaking" case, but as a "law-making" case. The Court indicated that certain aspects of this case may be creating new law as well.
Nissan Motor is now asking the Court to transfer nissan.com to them entirely. The potential loss of a domain name in this fashion may set the wrong precedent for future cases and will open the door for any deep-pocket corporation to do the same. This may become "the law of the land" by being solely based on "the law of the jungle", and could affect you or someone you know. **
_DECEMBER - 2002, Final Injunction.
_The district court issued a ** final Judgment (PDF) ** allowing Nissan Computer to keep its nissan.com and nissan.net domain names, but restricted our rights to do the following:
1. Posting Commercial content at nissan.com and nissan.net;
2. Posting advertising or permitting advertising to be posted by third parties at
nissan.com and nissan.net;
3. Posting disparaging remarks or negative commentary regarding Nissan Motor
Co., Ltd. or Nissan North America, Inc. at nissan.com and nissan.net;
4. Placing, on nissan.com or nissan.net, links to other websites containing
commercial content, including advertising; and
5. Placing, on nissan.com or nissan.net, links to other websites containing
disparaging remarks or negative commentary regarding Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
or Nissan North America.
After reviewing this and other rulings of the district court, we believed that the only practical option was to appeal. One of the reasons for the appeal is that we and other experts considered the injunction and parts of other rulings to be a clear violation of our "First Amendment Rights" as it is to every American citizen's constitutional rights.
_OCTOBER - 2003, Appeal Initial Motion.
**Nissan Computer filed its ** Opening Brief (PDF) **to the 9th circuit court of appeals, addressing the district court's rulings on:
A. Trademark Dilution
B. Trademark Infringement
C. Final Injunction
_ NOTE: It's a long brief, but will allow you to better understand the merits of this case. **
_JANUARY - 2004, Appeal Reply Motion.
_Nissan Motor filed a consolidated brief opposing Nissan Computer's opening brief and a cross appeal on:
A. Trademark Infringement.
B. Final Injunction.
C. Requesting the court to force transfer Nissan.com to them.
Nissan Computer filed a Consolidated Brief (PDF) ** opposing NMC's cross appeal and replying to their opposition.**
_AUGUST - 2004, Appeal Ruling.
_ The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling reversing the case and remanding it back to the District Court. In a ** Published Opinion ** (PDF) the Appellant Court rejected Nissan Motor's cross appeal and reversed the District Court's ruling against Nissan Computer on Dilution and the broad scope of the Final Injunction.
Not to our surprise, Nissan Motor filed a motion for rehearing by the 9th Circuit's panel and a rehearing en banc (a rehearing by all of the Court of Appeals Judges). On September 2004, the 9th Circuit issued a ** Ruling ** (PDF) ** denying Nissan Motor's motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc.**
_DECEMBER - 2004, Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court.
_ ** Nissan Motor filed a Petition for a "Writ of Certiorari" to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking review of the Appellant Court ruling on the Infringement and First Amendment issues.**
_APRIL - 2005, U.S. Supreme Court Order.
_ ** The U.S. Supreme Court has issued an ** Order, ** (PDF)** ** Denying Nissan Motor's Petition for a "Writ of Certiorari", thus the dilution claim, which is the only remaining issue was sent back to the district court.
** JANUARY - 2007, Motion to strike Jury Demand.
** Nissan Motor's intentions to deprive us of a jury trial was evident from the beginning, they always felt that they have a better chance of prevailing in front of the judge rather than the jury. In the 11th hour, after all their efforts to do so was unsuccessful, they pulled their last ace and dropped their $10,000,000 damage claim in exchange for a "bench trial" rather then a "jury Trial".**
** ** MARCH - 2007, Trial.
** The four-day bench trial occurred between March 27 and March 30 to determine NMC's claims on:
1. Dilution
2. Permanent Injunction re: Dilution.
3. Permanent Injunction re: Infringement.
We are now waiting for the court's ruling on these matters.
** SEPTEMBER - 2007, Ruling.
** The court has issued a ** Ruling ** (PDF) addressing NMC's alleged claims in our favor:
1. Found that Nissan Computer did not Dilute NMC's mark.
2. Denied NMC's requests for Permanent Injunctions.
We are still waiting for the court to issue a final judgment.
JANUARY - 2008, Motion For Attorneys' Fees.
Nissan Motor has been unrelenting in its lawsuit against us and despite that they lost; they subsequently filed a motion asking the court to award them millions of dollars in attorneys' fees.
FEBRUARY - 2008, Ruling on Attorneys' Fees and Final Judgment.
The court has issued a **Ruling ** (PDF) addressing these remaining issues:
1. Nissan Motor is NOT entitled to attorneys' fees.
2. Nissan Computer is entitled to cost under rule 68.
The court ordered NMC to pay $58,000 as cost under rule 68, this is less than 2% of what the cost was to defend this case.
You would think this case is over..... but it really isn't.
_ Nissan Motor's trademark registration._
Nissan Motor is attempting to obtain a **Federal Trademark Registration **for computers and computer peripherals among other classes of goods and services. We feel that Nissan Motor, in this action, is staging a future case against us in the computer and peripherals market.
We are left with no other course of action but to oppose this registration.
**
**
| Public awareness of this unacceptable corporate behavior is crucial to eradicating it and we are asking you to take a stand and make a difference on this issue. Your collective voice is more compelling than the lobbying power of corporate giants and it is a voice that cannot be ignored.
Together we can make a difference and help keep our freedom intact, for us, for our children, and for our grandchildren. **
** |
| ----- |
| | Take a Stand and Make a Difference
click here | |
|
|
| ----- | |
|
Copyright © 1994 - 2014 Digest.com