hn-classics/_stories/2001/14119465.md

14 KiB

created_at title url author points story_text comment_text num_comments story_id story_title story_url parent_id created_at_i _tags objectID year
2017-04-15T04:57:43.000Z Measures of Complexity: A non-exhaustive list (2001) [pdf] http://web.mit.edu/esd.83/www/notebook/Complexity.PDF breck 92 7 1492232263
story
author_breck
story_14119465
14119465 2001

Source

%PDF-1.2 % 10 0 obj << /Length 11 0 R >> stream BT 222.75 705.75 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 15.75 Tf 0.164 Tc 0.0235 Tw (Measures of Complexity) Tj 11.25 -24 TD 0.0872 Tc -0.2747 Tw (a non--exhaustive list) Tj 42 -21.75 TD /F0 12.75 Tf 0.0308 Tc 0.5317 Tw (Seth Lloyd) Tj -123 -20.25 TD /F1 12 Tf -0.042 Tc 0.417 Tw (d'Arbeloff Laboratory for Information Systems and Technology) Tj 58.5 -20.25 TD -0.0162 Tc 0.0162 Tw (Department of Mechanical Engineering) Tj 2.25 -19.5 TD -0.0362 Tc 0.5362 Tw (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Tj 54 -20.25 TD 0.0373 Tc 0 Tw (slloyd@mit.edu) Tj -177.75 -19.5 TD -0.0884 Tc 0.4634 Tw ( The world has grown more complex recently, and the number of ways of measuring) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.066 Tc 0.4698 Tw (complexity has grown even faster. This multiplication of measures has been taken by) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0559 Tc 0.3372 Tw (some to indicate confusion in the field of complex systems. In fact, the many measures) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0551 Tc 0.4013 Tw (of complexity represent variations on a few underlying themes. Here is an (incomplete)) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0688 Tc 0.4855 Tw (list of measures of complexity grouped into the corresponding themes.) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0461 Tc 0.2768 Tw (An historical analog to the problem of measuring complexity is the problem of describing) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0157 Tc 0.0907 Tw (electromagnetism before Maxwell's equations. In the case of electromagnetism,) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0272 Tc 0.2147 Tw (quantities such as electric and magnetic forces that arose in different experimental) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0364 Tc 0.241 Tw (contexts were originally regarded as fundamentally different. Eventually it became) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0808 Tc 0.4557 Tw (clear that electricity and magnetism were in fact closely related aspects of the same) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0317 Tc 0.2567 Tw (fundamental quantity, the electromagnetic field. Similarly, contemporary researchers in) Tj T* -0.0437 Tc 0.377 Tw (architecture, biology, computer science, dynamical systems, engineering, finance, game) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0759 Tc 0.3973 Tw (theory, etc., have defined different measures of complexity for each field. Because) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0338 Tc 0.2213 Tw (these researchers were asking the same questions about the complexity of their different) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0973 Tc 0.4973 Tw (subjects of research, however, the answers that they came up with for how to measure) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0249 Tc 0.0249 Tw (complexity bear a considerable similarity to ) Tj 213 0 TD -0.0366 Tc 0.3366 Tw (eachother. Three questions that researchers) Tj -213 -13.5 TD -0.0651 Tc 0.3378 Tw (frequently ask to quantify the complexity of the thing (house, bacterium, problem,) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0624 Tc 0.3124 Tw (process, investment scheme) under study are) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.1553 Tc 0.6553 Tw (1. How hard is it to describe?) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.1653 Tc 0.6653 Tw (2. How hard is it to create?) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0587 Tc 0.3087 Tw (3. What is its degree of organization?) Tj T* -0.0679 Tc 0.4679 Tw (Here is a list of some measures of complexity grouped according to the question that they) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0304 Tc 0.1668 Tw (try to answer. Measures within a group are typically closely related quantities.) Tj 0 -39.75 TD /F0 12 Tf 0.1003 Tc -0.3503 Tw (1. Difficulty of description) Tj 135 0 TD /F1 12 Tf -0.1262 Tc 0.4262 Tw (. Typically measured in bits.) Tj -135 -19.5 TD -0.055 Tc 0 Tw (Information;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.1875 Tc (Entropy;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.041 Tc 0.341 Tw (Algorithmic Complexity or Algorithmic Information Content;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0734 Tc 0.8234 Tw (Minimum Description Length;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.0367 Tc 0.0367 Tw (Fisher Information;) Tj ET endstream endobj 11 0 obj 3758 endobj 4 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 10 0 R >> endobj 13 0 obj << /Length 14 0 R >> stream BT 90 709.5 TD 0 0 0 rg /F1 12 Tf -0.186 Tc 0.936 Tw (Renyi Entropy;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.0369 Tc 0.0369 Tw (Code Length (prefix-free, Huffman, Shannon-) Tj 222 0 TD -0.0255 Tc 0.4005 Tw (Fano, error-correcting, Hamming);) Tj -222 -19.5 TD -0.024 Tc 0.024 Tw (Chernoff Information;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.0504 Tc 0 Tw (Dimension;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.1534 Tc -0.5966 Tw (Fractal ) Tj 36 0 TD -0.1254 Tc 0 Tw (Dimension;) Tj -36 -19.5 TD -0.0503 Tc (Lempel--) Tj 44.25 0 TD -0.096 Tc 0.096 Tw (Ziv Complexity.) Tj -44.25 -39.75 TD /F0 12 Tf 0.0957 Tc -0.5957 Tw (2. Difficulty of creation) Tj 119.25 0 TD /F1 12 Tf -0.073 Tc 0.3542 Tw (. Typically measured in time, energy, dollars, etc.) Tj -119.25 -20.25 TD -0.0646 Tc -0.6854 Tw (Computational ) Tj 73.5 0 TD -0.0693 Tc 0 Tw (Complexity;) Tj -73.5 -19.5 TD -0.0512 Tc 0.0512 Tw (Time Computational Complexity;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0606 Tc 0.0606 Tw (Space Computational Complexity;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.0571 Tc 0.0571 Tw (Information--Based Complexity;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.1403 Tc 0.1403 Tw (Logical Depth;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.0913 Tc 0.0913 Tw (Thermodynamic Depth;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.1188 Tc 0 Tw (Cost;) Tj T* -0.1293 Tc (Crypticity.) Tj 0 -20.25 TD /F0 12 Tf 0.1135 Tc -0.4885 Tw (3. Degree of organization. ) Tj 135.75 0 TD /F1 12 Tf -0.053 Tc 0.2576 Tw (This may be divided up into two quantities: a) Difficulty of) Tj -135.75 -13.5 TD -0.0227 Tc 0.1165 Tw (describing organizational structure, whether corporate, chemical, cellular, etc.; b)) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.0434 Tc 0.2041 Tw (Amount of information shared between the parts of a system as the result of this) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0163 Tc 0.0163 Tw (organizational structure.) Tj 0 -19.5 TD /F2 12 Tf 0.0646 Tc -0.0646 Tw (a) Effective Complexity) Tj 0 -20.25 TD /F1 12 Tf -0.0865 Tc 0.2911 Tw (Metric Entropy; Fractal Dimension; Excess Entropy;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0283 Tc 0.0283 Tw (Stochastic Complexity;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.1008 Tc 0 Tw (Sophistication;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0207 Tc 0.0207 Tw (Effective Measure Complexity;) Tj T* -0.0788 Tc 0.0788 Tw (True Measure Complexity;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.0343 Tc 0.0343 Tw (Topological epsilon-machine size;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0387 Tc 0.0387 Tw (Conditional ) Tj 59.25 0 TD 0.0075 Tc 0 Tw (Information;) Tj -59.25 -20.25 TD -0.0246 Tc 0.0246 Tw (Conditional Algorithmic Information Content;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.082 Tc 0.082 Tw (Schema ) Tj 41.25 0 TD -0.2623 Tc 0 Tw (length;) Tj -41.25 -19.5 TD -0.0938 Tc 0.0938 Tw (Ideal Complexity;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.0681 Tc 0.0681 Tw (Hierarchical Complexity;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.246 Tc 0.246 Tw (Tree ) Tj 24.75 0 TD -0.0877 Tc 0.0877 Tw (subgraph diversity;) Tj ET endstream endobj 14 0 obj 2770 endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F2 15 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 13 0 R >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Length 19 0 R >> stream BT 90 709.5 TD 0 0 0 rg /F1 12 Tf -0.0976 Tc 0.0976 Tw (Homogeneous ) Tj 71.25 0 TD 0.0671 Tc 0 Tw (Complexity;) Tj -71.25 -20.25 TD -0.0717 Tc 0.0717 Tw (Grammatical Complexity.) Tj 0 -19.5 TD /F2 12 Tf -0.0123 Tc 0.0123 Tw (b) Mutual Information:) Tj 0 -20.25 TD /F1 12 Tf -0.0861 Tc 0.4611 Tw (Algorithmic Mutual Information;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0308 Tc 0.0308 Tw (Channel Capacity;) Tj T* -0.1455 Tc 0 Tw (Correlation;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.097 Tc 0.097 Tw (Stored ) Tj 33.75 0 TD 0.0075 Tc 0 Tw (Information;) Tj -33.75 -19.5 TD -0.0886 Tc (Organization.) Tj 0 -39.75 TD -0.0619 Tc 0.2962 Tw ( In addition to the above measures, there are a number of related concepts that are not) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0301 Tc 0.1455 Tw (quantitative measures of complexity per se, but that are closely related. Such concepts) Tj 0 -14.25 TD -0.1183 Tc 0 Tw (include) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0473 Tc 0.0473 Tw (Long--Range Order;) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.0954 Tc 0 Tw (Self--Organization;) Tj 0 -19.5 TD -0.0365 Tc 0.0365 Tw (Complex Adaptive Systems;) Tj T* -0.0755 Tc 0.0755 Tw (Edge of Chaos.) Tj 0 -20.25 TD -0.135 Tc 0.6037 Tw (Please feel free to send me additions to this list, whether or not they fall in the) Tj 0 -13.5 TD -0.0863 Tc 0.8363 Tw (classification scheme.) Tj 0 -20.25 TD 0.0008 Tc 0.3742 Tw (Seth Lloyd, slloyd@mit.edu) Tj ET endstream endobj 19 0 obj 1378 endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 15 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 18 0 R >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F0 /BaseFont /TimesNewRoman,Bold /FirstChar 31 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 778 250 333 555 500 500 1000 833 278 333 333 500 570 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 333 333 570 570 570 500 930 722 667 722 722 667 611 778 778 389 500 778 667 944 722 778 611 778 722 556 667 722 722 1000 722 722 667 333 278 333 581 500 333 500 556 444 556 444 333 500 556 278 333 556 278 833 556 500 556 556 444 389 333 556 500 722 500 500 444 394 220 394 520 778 500 778 333 500 500 1000 500 500 333 1000 556 333 1000 778 778 778 778 333 333 500 500 350 500 1000 333 1000 389 333 722 778 778 722 250 333 500 500 500 500 220 500 333 747 300 500 570 333 747 500 400 549 300 300 333 576 540 250 333 300 330 500 750 750 750 500 722 722 722 722 722 722 1000 722 667 667 667 667 389 389 389 389 722 722 778 778 778 778 778 570 778 722 722 722 722 722 611 556 500 500 500 500 500 500 722 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 278 500 556 500 500 500 500 500 549 500 556 556 556 556 500 556 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /TimesNewRoman,Bold /Flags 16418 /FontBBox [ -250 -238 1200 905 ] /MissingWidth 762 /StemV 136 /StemH 136 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 905 /XHeight 633 /Ascent 905 /Descent -238 /Leading 191 /MaxWidth 1000 /AvgWidth 429 >> endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F1 /BaseFont /TimesNewRoman /FirstChar 31 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 778 250 333 408 500 500 833 778 180 333 333 500 564 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 564 564 564 444 921 722 667 667 722 611 556 722 722 333 389 722 611 889 722 722 556 722 667 556 611 722 722 944 722 722 611 333 278 333 469 500 333 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278 278 500 278 778 500 500 500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500 500 444 480 200 480 541 778 500 778 333 500 444 1000 500 500 333 1000 556 333 889 778 778 778 778 333 333 444 444 350 500 1000 333 980 389 333 722 778 778 722 250 333 500 500 500 500 200 500 333 760 276 500 564 333 760 500 400 549 300 300 333 576 453 250 333 300 310 500 750 750 750 444 722 722 722 722 722 722 889 667 611 611 611 611 333 333 333 333 722 722 722 722 722 722 722 564 722 722 722 722 722 722 556 500 444 444 444 444 444 444 667 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 549 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 9 0 R >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /TimesNewRoman /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -250 -250 1200 938 ] /MissingWidth 750 /StemV 68 /StemH 68 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 938 /XHeight 656 /Ascent 938 /Descent -250 /Leading 251 /MaxWidth 1000 /AvgWidth 375 >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F2 /BaseFont /TimesNewRoman,Italic /FirstChar 31 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 778 250 333 420 500 500 833 778 214 333 333 500 675 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 333 333 675 675 675 500 920 611 611 667 722 611 611 722 722 333 444 667 556 833 667 722 611 722 611 500 556 722 611 833 611 556 556 389 278 389 422 500 333 500 500 444 500 444 278 500 500 278 278 444 278 722 500 500 500 500 389 389 278 500 444 667 444 444 389 400 275 400 541 778 500 778 333 500 556 889 500 500 333 1000 500 333 944 778 778 778 778 333 333 556 556 350 500 889 333 980 389 333 667 778 778 556 250 389 500 500 500 500 275 500 333 760 276 500 675 333 760 500 400 549 300 300 333 576 523 250 333 300 310 500 750 750 750 500 611 611 611 611 611 611 889 667 611 611 611 611 333 333 333 333 722 667 722 722 722 722 722 675 722 722 722 722 722 556 611 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 667 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 549 500 500 500 500 500 444 500 444 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 16 0 R >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /TimesNewRoman,Italic /Flags 98 /FontBBox [ -250 -250 1200 938 ] /MissingWidth 750 /StemV 68 /StemH 68 /ItalicAngle -11 /CapHeight 938 /XHeight 656 /Ascent 938 /Descent -250 /Leading 251 /MaxWidth 1000 /AvgWidth 375 >> endobj 2 0 obj [ /PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Kids [4 0 R 12 0 R 17 0 R ] /Count 3 /Type /Pages /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] >> endobj 1 0 obj << /Creator /CreationDate (D:20001101111613) /Title /Author /Producer (Acrobat PDFWriter 4.05 for Windows) >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Pages 5 0 R /Type /Catalog /DefaultGray 20 0 R /DefaultRGB 21 0 R >> endobj 20 0 obj [/CalGray << /WhitePoint [0.9505 1 1.089 ] /Gamma 0.2468 >> ] endobj 21 0 obj [/CalRGB << /WhitePoint [0.9505 1 1.089 ] /Gamma [0.2468 0.2468 0.2468 ] /Matrix [0.4361 0.2225 0.0139 0.3851 0.7169 0.0971 0.1431 0.0606 0.7141 ] >> ] endobj xref 0 22 0000000000 65535 f 0000013004 00000 n 0000012864 00000 n 0000013303 00000 n 0000003864 00000 n 0000012898 00000 n 0000008630 00000 n 0000009760 00000 n 0000010049 00000 n 0000011169 00000 n 0000000021 00000 n 0000003840 00000 n 0000006863 00000 n 0000004008 00000 n 0000006839 00000 n 0000011448 00000 n 0000012575 00000 n 0000008484 00000 n 0000007021 00000 n 0000008460 00000 n 0000013400 00000 n 0000013487 00000 n trailer << /Size 22 /Root 3 0 R /Info 1 0 R /ID [<0dd28efa8b5393fffaf885f75b94d40c><0dd28efa8b5393fffaf885f75b94d40c>] >> startxref 13664 %%EOF