--- created_at: '2013-05-06T18:31:50.000Z' title: Linux is not about choice (2008) url: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html author: emillon points: 295 story_text: '' comment_text: num_comments: 231 story_id: story_title: story_url: parent_id: created_at_i: 1367865110 _tags: - story - author_emillon - story_5663926 objectID: '5663926' year: 2008 --- [Source](https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html "Permalink to Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]") # Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?] * * * [[Date Prev][1]][[Date Next][2]]   [[Thread Prev][3]][[Thread Next][4]]   [[Thread Index][5]] [[Date Index][6]] [[Author Index][7]] # Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?] * * * * _From_: Adam Jackson * _To_: Development discussions related to Fedora * _Subject_: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?] * _Date_: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:58:45 -0500 * * * > Linux is about choice. If I could only have one thing this year, it would be to eliminate that meme from the collective consciousness. It is a disease. It strangles the mind and ensures you can never change anything ever because someone somewhere has OCD'd their environment exactly how they like it and how dare you change it on them you're so mean and next time I have friends over for Buffy night you're not invited mom he's sitting on my side again. As a consumer, yes, you have lots of choices in which Linux you use. This does not mean Linux is in any sense _about_ choice, any more than because there are so many kinds of cars you can buy that cars are about choice. The complaints up-thread about juju and pulse are entirely valid, but the solution is not to try to deliver two things at once. If you try to deliver both at once you have to also deliver a way of switching between the two. Now you have three moving parts instead of one, which means the failure rate has gone up by a factor of _six_ (three parts, and three interactions). We have essentially already posited that we have insufficient developer effort to have 100%-complete features at ship time, so asking them to take on six times the failure rate when they're already overburdened is just madness. Alternatively, we could say that we're integrating features too rapidly, but you do that at the expense of goal 1, to be the showcase for the latest and greatest in free software. Software is hard. The way to fix it is to fix it, not sweep it under the rug. There is a legitimate discussion to be had about where and how we draw the line for feature inclusion, about how we increase and formalize our testing efforts, and about how we develop and deploy spike solutions for corner-case problems like the one device class that juju happens to do worse than the old stack. But the chain of logic from "Linux is about choice" to "ship everything and let the user chose how they want their sound to not work" starts with fallacy and ends with disaster. - ajax * * * * **Follow-Ups**: * [**Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]][4]** * _From:_ Jesse Keating * [**Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]][8]** * _From:_ Dave Airlie * [**Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]][9]** * _From:_ Thorsten Leemhuis * [**Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]][10]** * _From:_ David Zeuthen * [**Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]][11]** * _From:_ John Dennis * [**Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]][12]** * _From:_ Patrice Dumas * **References**: * [**Fedora too cutting edge?][13]** * _From:_ Hans de Goede * [**Re: Fedora too cutting edge?][14]** * _From:_ Thorsten Leemhuis [[Date Prev][1]][[Date Next][2]]   [[Thread Prev][3]][[Thread Next][4]]   [[Thread Index][5]] [[Date Index][6]] [[Author Index][7]] [1]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00860.html [2]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00862.html [3]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00859.html [4]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00863.html [5]: https://www.redhat.com/thread.html#00861 [6]: https://www.redhat.com/date.html#00861 [7]: https://www.redhat.com/author.html#00861 [8]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00865.html [9]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00869.html [10]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00871.html [11]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00875.html [12]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00888.html [13]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00845.html [14]: https://www.redhat.com/msg00848.html