--- created_at: '2015-05-17T09:30:04.000Z' title: The Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant (2005) url: http://www.nickbostrom.com/fable/dragon.html author: forloop points: 57 story_text: comment_text: num_comments: 38 story_id: story_title: story_url: parent_id: created_at_i: 1431855004 _tags: - story - author_forloop - story_9559360 objectID: '9559360' year: 2005 --- > Once upon a time, the planet was tyrannized by a giant dragon. The > dragon stood taller than the largest cathedral, and it was covered > with thick black scales. Its red eyes glowed with hate, and from its > terrible jaws flowed an incessant stream of evil-smelling > yellowish-green slime. It demanded from humankind a blood-curdling > tribute: to satisfy its enormous appetite, ten thousand men and women > had to be delivered every evening at the onset of dark to the foot of > the mountain where the dragon-tyrant lived. Sometimes the dragon would > devour these unfortunate souls upon arrival; sometimes again it would > lock them up in the mountain where they would wither away for months > or years before eventually being consumed. > > The misery inflicted by the dragon-tyrant was incalculable. In > addition to the ten thousand who were gruesomely slaughtered each day, > there were the mothers, fathers, wives, husbands, children, and > friends that were left behind to grieve the loss of their departed > loved ones. > > Some people tried to fight the dragon, but whether they were brave or > foolish was difficult to say. Priests and magicians called down > curses, to no avail. Warriors, armed with roaring courage and the best > weapons the smiths could produce, attacked it, but were incinerated by > its fire before coming close enough to strike. Chemists concocted > toxic brews and tricked the dragon into swallowing them, but the only > apparent effect was to further stimulate its appetite. The dragon’s > claws, jaws, and fire were so effective, its scaly armor so > impregnable, and its whole nature so robust, as to make it invincible > to any human assault. > > Seeing that defeating the tyrant was impossible, humans had no choice > but to obey its commands and pay the grisly tribute. The fatalities > selected were always elders. Although senior people were as vigorous > and healthy as the young, and sometimes wiser, the thinking was that > they had at least already enjoyed a few decades of life. The wealthy > might gain a brief reprieve by bribing the press gangs that came to > fetch them; but, by constitutional law, nobody, not even the king > himself, could put off their turn indefinitely. > > Spiritual men sought to comfort those who were afraid of being eaten > by the dragon (which included almost everyone, although many denied it > in public) by promising another life after death, a life that would be > free from the dragon-scourge. Other orators argued that the dragon has > its place in the natural order and a moral right to be fed. They said > that it was part of the very meaning of being human to end up in the > dragon’s stomach. Others still maintained that the dragon was good for > the human species because it kept the population size down. To what > extent these arguments convinced the worried souls is not known. Most > people tried to cope by not thinking about the grim end that awaited > them. > > For many centuries this desperate state of affairs continued. Nobody > kept count any longer of the cumulative death toll, nor of the number > of tears shed by the bereft. Expectations had gradually adjusted and > the dragon-tyrant had become a fact of life. In view of the evident > futility of resistance, attempts to kill the dragon had ceased. > Instead, efforts now focused on placating it. While the dragon would > occasionally raid the cities, it was found that the punctual delivery > to the mountain of its quota of life reduced the frequency of these > incursions. > > Knowing that their turn to become dragon-fodder was always impending, > people began having children earlier and more often. It was not > uncommon for a girl to be pregnant by her sixteenth birthday. Couples > often spawned a dozen children. The human population was thus kept > from shrinking, and the dragon was kept from going hungry. > > Over the course of these centuries, the dragon, being well fed, slowly > but steadily grew bigger. It had become almost as large as the > mountain on which it lived. And its appetite had increased > proportionately. Ten thousand human bodies were no longer enough to > fill its belly. It now demanded eighty thousand, to be delivered to > the foot of the mountain every evening at the onset of dark. > > What occupied the king’s mind more than the deaths and the dragon > itself was the logistics of collecting and transporting so many people > to the mountain every day. This was not an easy task. > > To facilitate the process, the king had a railway track constructed: > two straight lines of glistening steel leading up to the dragon’s > abode. Every twenty minutes, a train would arrive at the mountain > terminal crammed with people, and would return empty. On moonlit > nights, the passengers traveling on this train, if there had been > windows for them to stick their heads out of, would have been able to > see in front of them the double silhouette of the dragon and the > mountain, and two glowing red eyes, like the beams from a pair of > giant lighthouses, pointing the way to annihilation. > > Servants were employed by the king in large numbers to administer the > tribute. There were registrars who kept track of whose turn it was to > be sent. There were people-collectors who would be dispatched in > special carts to fetch the designated people. Often traveling at > breakneck speed, they would rush their cargo either to a railway > station or directly to the mountain. There were clerks who > administered the pensions paid to the decimated families who were no > longer able to support themselves. There were comforters who would > travel with the doomed on their way to the dragon, trying to ease > their anguish with spirits and drugs. > > There was, moreover, a cadre of dragonologists who studied how these > logistic processes could be made more efficient. Some dragonologists > also conducted studies of the dragon’s physiology and behavior, and > collected samples – its shed scales, the slime that drooled from its > jaws, its lost teeth, and its excrements, which were specked with > fragments of human bone. All these items were painstakingly annotated > and archived. The more the beast was understood, the more the general > perception of its invincibility was confirmed. Its black scales, in > particular, were harder than any material known to man, and there > seemed no way to make as much as a scratch in its armor. > > To finance all these activities, the king levied heavy taxes on his > people. Dragon-related expenditures, already accounting for one > seventh of the economy, were growing even faster than the dragon > itself. > > Humanity is a curious species. Every once in a while, somebody gets a > good idea. Others copy the idea, adding to it their own improvements. > Over time, many wondrous tools and systems are developed. Some of > these devices – calculators, thermometers, microscopes, and the glass > vials that the chemists use to boil and distil liquids – serve to make > it easier to generate and try out new ideas, including ideas that > expedite the process of idea-generation. > > Thus the great wheel of invention, which had turned at an almost > imperceptibly slow pace in the older ages, gradually began to > accelerate. > > Sages predicted that a day would come when technology would enable > humans to fly and do many other astonishing things. One of the sages, > who was held in high esteem by some of the other sages but whose > eccentric manners had made him a social outcast and recluse, went so > far as to predict that technology would eventually make it possible to > build a contraption that could kill the dragon-tyrant. > > The king’s scholars, however, dismissed these ideas. They said that > humans were far too heavy to fly and in any case lacked feathers. And > as for the impossible notion that the dragon-tyrant could be killed, > history books recounted hundreds of attempts to do just that, not one > of which had been successful. “We all know that this man had some > irresponsible ideas,” a scholar of letters later wrote in his obituary > of the reclusive sage who had by then been sent off to be devoured by > the beast whose demise he had foretold, “but his writings were quite > entertaining and perhaps we should be grateful to the dragon for > making possible the interesting genre of dragon-bashing literature > which reveals so much about the culture of angst\!” > > Meanwhile, the wheel of invention kept turning. Mere decades later, > humans did fly and accomplished many other astonishing things. > > A few iconoclastic dragonologists began arguing for a new attack on > the dragon-tyrant. Killing the dragon would not be easy, they said, > but if some material could be invented that was harder than the > dragon’s armor, and if this material could be fashioned into some > kind of projectile, then maybe the feat would be possible. At first, > the iconoclasts’ ideas were rejected by their dragonologist peers on > grounds that no known material was harder than dragon scales. But > after working on the problem for many years, one of the iconoclasts > succeeded in demonstrating that a dragon scale could be pierced by an > object made of a certain composite material. Many dragonologists who > had previously been skeptical now joined the iconoclasts. Engineers > calculated that a huge projectile could be made of this material and > launched with sufficient force to penetrate the dragon’s armor. > However, the manufacture of the needed quantity of the composite > material would be expensive. > > A group of several eminent engineers and dragonologists sent a > petition to the king asking for funding to build the anti-dragon > projectile. At time when the petition was sent, the king was > preoccupied with leading his army into war against a tiger. The tiger > had killed a farmer and subsequently disappeared into the jungle. > There was widespread fear in the countryside that the tiger might come > out and strike again. The king had the jungle surrounded and ordered > his troops to begin slashing their way through it. At the conclusion > of the campaign, the king could announce that all 163 tigers in the > jungle, including presumably the murderous one, had been hunted down > and killed. During the tumult of the war, however, the petition had > been lost or forgotten. > > The petitioners therefore sent another appeal. This time they received > a reply from one of the king’s secretaries saying that the king would > consider their request after he was done reviewing the annual > dragon-administration budget. This year’s budget was the largest to > date and included funding for a new railway track to the mountain. A > second track was deemed necessary, as the original track could no > longer support the increasing traffic. (The tribute demanded by the > dragon-tyrant had increased to one hundred thousand human beings, to > be delivered to the foot of the mountain every evening at the onset of > dark.) When the budget was finally approved, however, reports were > coming from a remote part of the country that a village was suffering > from a rattlesnake infestation. The king had to leave urgently to > mobilize his army and ride off to defeat this new threat. The > anti-dragonists’ appeal was filed away in a dusty cabinet in the > castle basement. > > The anti-dragonists met again to decide what was to be done. The > debate was animated and continued long into the night. It was almost > daybreak when they finally resolved to take the matter to the people. > Over the following weeks, they traveled around the country, gave > public lectures, and explained their proposal to anyone who would > listen. At first, people were skeptical. They had been taught in > school that the dragon-tyrant was invincible and that the sacrifices > it demanded had to be accepted as a fact of life. Yet when they learnt > about the new composite material and about the designs for the > projectile, many became intrigued. In increasing numbers, citizens > flocked to the anti-dragonist lectures. Activists started organizing > public rallies in support of the proposal. > > When the king read about these meetings in the newspaper, he summoned > his advisors and asked them what they thought about it. They informed > him about the petitions that had been sent but told him that the > anti-dragonists were troublemakers whose teachings were causing public > unrest. It was much better for the social order, they said, that the > people accepted the inevitability of the dragon-tyrant tribute. The > dragon-administration provided many jobs that would be lost if the > dragon was slaughtered. There was no known social good coming from the > conquest of the dragon. In any case, the king’s coffers were currently > nearly empty after the two military campaigns and the funding set > aside for the second railway line. The king, who was at the time > enjoying great popularity for having vanquished the rattlesnake > infestation, listened to his advisors’ arguments but worried that he > might lose some of his popular support if was seen to ignore the > anti-dragonist petition. He therefore decided to hold an open hearing. > Leading dragonologists, ministers of the state, and interested members > of the public were invited to attend. > > The meeting took place on the darkest day of the year, just before the > Christmas holidays, in the largest hall of the royal castle. The hall > was packed to the last seat and people were crowding in the aisles. > The mood was charged with an earnest intensity normally reserved for > pivotal wartime sessions. > > After the king had welcomed everyone, he gave the floor to the leading > scientist behind the anti-dragonist proposal, a woman with a serious, > almost stern expression on her face. She proceeded to explain in clear > language how the proposed device would work and how the requisite > amount of the composite material could be manufactured. Given the > requested amount of funding, it should be possible to complete the > work in fifteen to twenty years. With an even greater amount of > funding, it might be possible to do it in as little as twelve years. > However, there could be no absolute guarantee that it would work. The > crowd followed her presentation intently. > > Next to speak was the king’s chief advisor for morality, a man with a > booming voice that easily filled the auditorium: > > “Let us grant that this woman is correct about the science and that > the project is technologically possible, although I don’t think that > has actually been proven. Now she desires that we get rid of the > dragon. Presumably, she thinks she’s got the right not to be chewed up > by the dragon. How willful and presumptuous. The finitude of human > life is a blessing for every individual, whether he knows it or not. > Getting rid of the dragon, which might seem like such a convenient > thing to do, would undermine our human dignity. The preoccupation with > killing the dragon will deflect us from realizing more fully the > aspirations to which our lives naturally point, from living well > rather than merely staying alive. It is debasing, yes debasing, for a > person to want to continue his or her mediocre life for as long as > possible without worrying about some of the higher questions about > what life is to be used for. But I tell you, the nature of the dragon > is to eat humans, and our own species-specified nature is truly and > nobly fulfilled only by getting eaten by it...” > > The audience listened respectfully to this highly decorated speaker. > The phrases were so eloquent that it was hard to resist the feeling > that some deep thoughts must lurk behind them, although nobody could > quite grasp what they were. Surely, words coming from such a > distinguished appointee of the king must have profound substance. > > The speaker next in line was a spiritual sage who was widely respected > for his kindness and gentleness as well as for his devotion. As he > strode to the podium, a small boy yelled out from the audience: “The > dragon is bad\!” > > The boy’s parents turned bright red and began hushing and scolding the > child. But the sage said, “Let the boy speak. He is probably wiser > than an old fool like me.” > > At first, the boy was too scared and confused to move. But when he saw > the genuinely friendly smile on the sage’s face and the outreached > hand, he obediently took it and followed the sage up to the podium. > “Now, there’s a brave little man,” said the sage. “Are you afraid of > the dragon?“ > > “I want my granny back,” said the boy. > > “Did the dragon take your granny away?” > > “Yes,” the boy said, tears welling up in his large frightened eyes. > “Granny promised that she would teach me how to bake gingerbread > cookies for Christmas. She said that we would make a little house out > of gingerbread and little gingerbread men that would live in it. Then > those people in white clothes came and took Granny away to the > dragon... The dragon is bad and it eats people… I want my Granny > back\!” > > At this point the child was crying so hard that the sage had to return > him to his parents. > > There were several other speakers that evening, but the child’s simple > testimony had punctured the rhetorical balloon that the king’s > ministers had tried to inflate. The people were backing the > anti-dragonists, and by the end of the evening even the king had come > to recognize the reason and the humanity of their cause. In his > closing statement, he simply said: “Let’s do it\!” > > As the news spread, celebrations erupted in the streets. Those who had > been campaigning for the anti-dragonists toasted each other and drank > to the future of humanity. > > The next morning, a billion people woke up and realized that their > turn to be sent to the dragon would come before the projectile would > be completed. A tipping point was reached. Whereas before, active > support for the anti-dragonist cause had been limited to a small group > of visionaries, it now became the number one priority and concern on > everybody’s mind. The abstract notion of “the general will” took on an > almost tangible intensity and concreteness. Mass rallies raised money > for the projectile project and urged the king to increase the level of > state support. The king responded to these appeals. In his New Year > address, he announced that he would pass an extra appropriations bill > to support the project at a high level of funding; additionally, he > would sell off his summer castle and some of his land and make a large > personal donation. “I believe that this nation should commit itself to > achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of freeing the world > from the ancient scourge of the dragon-tyrant.” > > Thus started a great technological race against time. The concept of > an anti-dragon projectile was simple, but to make it a reality > required solutions to a thousand smaller technical problems, each of > which required dozens of time-consuming steps and missteps. > Test-missiles were fired but fell dead to the ground or flew off in > the wrong direction. In one tragic accident, a wayward missile landed > on a hospital and killed several hundred patients and staff. But there > was now a real seriousness of purpose, and the tests continued even as > the corpses were being dug out from the debris. > > Despite almost unlimited funding and round-the-clock work by the > technicians, the king’s deadline could not be met. The decade > concluded and the dragon was still alive and well. But the effort was > getting closer. A prototype missile had been successfully test fired. > Production of the core, made of the expensive composite material, was > on schedule for its completion to coincide with the finishing of the > fully tested and debugged missile shell into which it was to be > loaded. The launch date was set to the following year’s New Year’s > Eve, exactly twelve years after the project’s official inauguration. > The best-selling Christmas gift that year was a calendar that counted > down the days to time zero, the proceeds going to the projectile > project. > > The king had undergone a personal transformation from his earlier > frivolous and thoughtless self. He now spent as much time as he could > in the laboratories and the manufacturing plants, encouraging the > workers and praising their toil. Sometimes he would bring a sleeping > bag and spend the night on a noisy machine floor. He even studied and > tried to understand the technical aspects of their work. Yet he > confined himself to giving moral support and refrained from meddling > in technical and managerial matters. > > Seven days before New Year, the woman who had made the case for the > project almost twelve years earlier, and was now its chief executive, > came to the royal castle and requested an urgent audience with the > king. When the king got her note, he excused himself to the foreign > dignitaries whom he was reluctantly entertaining at the annual > Christmas dinner and hurried off to the private room where the > scientist was waiting. As always of late, she looked pale and worn > from her long working hours. This evening, however, the king also > thought he could detect a ray of relief and satisfaction in her eyes. > > She told him that the missile had been deployed, the core had been > loaded, everything had been triple-checked, they were ready to launch, > and would the king give his final go-ahead. The king sank down in an > armchair and closed his eyes. He was thinking hard. By launching the > projectile tonight, one week early, seven hundred thousand people > would be saved. Yet if something went wrong, if it missed its target > and hit the mountain instead, it would be a disaster. A new core would > have to be constructed from scratch and the project would be set back > by some four years. He sat there, silently, for almost an hour. Just > as the scientist had become convinced that he had fallen asleep, he > opened his eyes and said in a firm voice: “No. I want you to go right > back to the lab. I want you to check and then re-check everything > again.” The scientist could not help a sigh escaping her; but she > nodded and left. > > The last day of the year was cold and overcast, but there was no wind, > which meant good launch conditions. The sun was setting. Technicians > were scuttling around making the final adjustments and giving > everything one last check. The king and his closest advisors were > observing from a platform close to the launch pad. Further away, > behind a fence, large numbers of the public had assembled to witness > the great event. A large clock was showing the countdown: fifty > minutes to go. > > An advisor tapped the king on the shoulder and drew his attention to > the fence. There was some tumult. Somebody had apparently jumped the > fence and was running towards the platform where the king sat. > Security quickly caught up with him. He was handcuffed and taken away. > The king turned his attention back to the launch pad, and to the > mountain in the background. In front of it, he could see the dark > slumped profile of the dragon. It was eating. > > Some twenty minutes later, the king was surprised to see the > handcuffed man reappearing a short distance from the platform. His > nose was bleeding and he was accompanied by two security guards. The > man appeared to be in frenzied state. When he spotted the king, he > began shouting at the top of his lungs: “The last train\! The last > train\! Stop the last train\!” > > “Who is this young man?” said the king. “His face seems familiar, but > I cannot quite place him. What does he want? Let him come up.” > > The young man was a junior clerk in the ministry of transportation, > and the reason for his frenzy was that he had discovered that his > father was on the last train to the mountain. The king had ordered the > train traffic to continue, fearing that any disruption might cause the > dragon to stir and leave the open field in front of the mountain where > it now spent most of its time. The young man begged the king to issue > a recall-order for the last train, which was due to arrive at the > mountain terminal five minutes before time zero. > > “I cannot do it,” said the king, “I cannot take the risk.” > > “But the trains frequently run five minutes late. The dragon won’t > notice\! Please\!” > > The young man was kneeling before the king, imploring him to save his > father’s life and the lives of the other thousand passengers onboard > that last train. > > The king looked down at the pleading, bloodied face of the young man. > But he bit his lip, and shook his head. The young man continued to > wail even as the guards carried him off the platform: “Please\! Stop > the last train\! Please\!” > > The king stood silent and motionless, until, after while, the wailing > suddenly ceased. The king looked up and glanced over at the countdown > clock: five minutes remaining. > > Four minutes. Three minutes. Two minutes. > > The last technician left the launch pad. > > 30 seconds. 20 seconds. Ten, nine, eight… > > As a ball of fire enveloped the launch pad and the missile shot out, > the spectators instinctively rose to the tips of their toes, and all > eyes fixated at the front end of the white flame from the rocket’s > afterburners heading towards the distant mountain. The masses, the > king, the low and the high, the young and the old, it was as if at > this moment they shared a single awareness, a single conscious > experience: that white flame, shooting into the dark, embodying the > human spirit, its fear and its hope… striking at the heart of evil. > The silhouette on the horizon tumbled, and fell. Thousand voices of > pure joy rose from the assembled masses, joined seconds later by a > deafening drawn-out thud from the collapsing monster as if the Earth > itself was drawing a sigh of relief. After centuries of oppression, > humanity at last was free from the cruel tyranny of the dragon. > > The joy cry resolved into a jubilating chant: “Long live the king\! > Long live us all\!” The king’s advisors, like everybody that night, > were as happy as children; they embraced each other and congratulated > the king: “We did it\! We did it\!” > > But the king answered in a broken voice: “Yes, we did it, we killed > the dragon today. But damn, why did we start so late? This could have > been done five, maybe ten years ago\! Millions of people wouldn’t have > had to die.” > > The king stepped off the platform and walked up to the young man in > handcuffs, who was sitting on the ground. There he fell down on his > knees. “Forgive me\! Oh my God, please forgive me\!” > > The rain started falling, in large, heavy drops, turning the ground > into mud, drenching the king’s purple robes, and dissolving the blood > on the young man’s face. “I am so very sorry about your father,” said > the king. > > “It’s not your fault,” replied the young man. “Do you remember twelve > years ago in the castle? That crying little boy who wanted you to > bring back his grandmother – that was me. I didn’t realize then that > you couldn’t possibly do what I asked for. Today I wanted you to save > my father. Yet it was impossible to do that now, without jeopardizing > the launch. But you have saved my life, and my mother and my sister. > How can we ever thank you enough for that?” > > “Listen to them,” said the king, gesturing towards the crowds. “They > are cheering me for what happened tonight. But the hero is you. You > cried out. You rallied us against evil.” The king signaled a guard to > come and unlock the handcuffs. “Now, go to your mother and sister. You > and your family shall always be welcome at the court, and anything you > wish for – if it be within my power – shall be granted.” > > The young man left, and the royal entourage, huddling in the downpour, > accumulated around their monarch who was still kneeling in the mud. > Amongst the fancy couture, which was being increasingly ruined by the > rain, a bunch of powdered faces expressed a superposition of joy, > relief, and discombobulation. So much had changed in the last hour: > the right to an open future had been regained, a primordial fear had > been abolished, and many a long-held assumption had been overturned. > Unsure now about what was required of them in this unfamiliar > situation, they stood there tentatively, as if probing whether the > ground would still hold, exchanging glances, and waiting for some kind > of indication. > > Finally, the king rose, wiping his hands on the sides of his pants. > > “Your majesty, what do we do now?” ventured the most senior courtier. > > “My dear friends,” said the king, “we have come a long way… yet our > journey has only just begun. Our species is young on this planet. > Today we are like children again. The future lies open before us. We > shall go into this future and try to do better than we have done in > the past. We have time now – time to get things right, time to grow > up, time to learn from our mistakes, time for the slow process of > building a better world, and time to get settled in it. Tonight, let > all the bells in the kingdom ring until midnight, in remembrance of > our dead forbears, and then after midnight let us celebrate till the > sun comes up. And in the coming days… I believe we have some > reorganization to do\!” > >   > > \* \* \* > >   > > MORAL > > Stories about aging have traditionally focused on the need for > graceful accommodation. The recommended solution to diminishing vigor > and impending death was resignation coupled with an effort to achieve > closure in practical affairs and personal relationships. Given that > nothing could be done to prevent or retard aging, this focus made > sense. Rather than fretting about the inevitable, one could aim for > peace of mind. > > Today we face a different situation. While we still lack effective and > acceptable means for slowing the aging process[\[1\]](#_ftn1), we can > identify research directions that might lead to the development of > such means in the foreseeable future. “Deathist” stories and > ideologies, which counsel passive acceptance, are no longer harmless > sources of consolation. They are fatal barriers to urgently needed > action. > > Many distinguished technologists and scientists tell us that it will > become possible to retard, and eventually to halt and reverse, human > senescence.[\[2\]](#_ftn2) At present, there is little agreement about > the time-scale or the specific means, nor is there a consensus that > the goal is even achievable in principle. In relation to the fable > (where aging is, of course, represented by the dragon), we are > therefore at a stage somewhere between that at which the lone sage > predicted the dragon’s eventual demise and that at which the > iconoclast dragonologists convinced their peers by demonstrating a > composite material that was harder than dragon scales. > > The ethical argument that the fable presents is simple: There are > obvious and compelling moral reasons for the people in the fable to > get rid of the dragon. Our situation with regard to human senescence > is closely analogous and ethically isomorphic to the situation of the > people in the fable with regard to the dragon. Therefore, we have > compelling moral reasons to get rid of human senescence. > > The argument is not in favor or life-span extension *per se*. Adding > extra years of sickness and debility at the end of life would be > pointless. The argument is in favor of extending, as far as possible, > the human *health-span*. By slowing or halting the aging process, the > healthy human life span would be extended. Individuals would be able > to remain healthy, vigorous, and productive at ages at which they > would otherwise be dead. > > In addition to this general moral, there are a number of more specific > lessons: > > *(1)  A recurrent tragedy became a fact of life, a statistic*. In the > fable, people’s expectations adapted to the existence of the dragon, > to the extent that many became unable to perceive its badness. Aging, > too, has become a mere “fact of life” – despite being the principal > cause of an unfathomable amount of human suffering and death. > > *(2)  A static view of technology*. People reasoned that it would > never become possible to kill the dragon because all attempts had > failed in the past. They failed to take into account accelerated > technological progress. Is a similar mistake leading us to > underestimate the chances of a cure for aging? > > *(3) * *Administration became its own purpose*. One seventh of the > economy went to dragon-administration (which is also the fraction of > its GDP that the U.S. spends on healthcare). Damage-limitation became > such an exclusive focus that it made people neglect the underlying > cause. Instead of a massive publicly-funded research program to halt > aging, we spend almost our entire health budget on health-care and on > researching individual diseases. > > *(4) * *The social good became detached from the good for people*. The > king’s advisors worried about the possible social problems that could > be caused by the anti-dragonists. They said that no known social good > would come from the demise of the dragon. Ultimately, however, social > orders exist for the benefit of people, and it is generally good for > people if their lives are saved. > > *(5) * *The lack of a sense of proportion.* A tiger killed a farmer. A > rhumba of rattlesnakes plagued a village. The king got rid of the > tiger and the rattlesnakes, and thereby did his people a service. Yet > he was at fault, because he got his priorities wrong. > > *(6) * *Fine phrases and hollow rhetoric*. The king’s morality advisor > spoke eloquently about human dignity and our species-specified nature, > in phrases lifted, mostly verbatim, from the advisor’s contemporary > equivalents.[\[3\]](#_ftn3) Yet the rhetoric was a smoke screen that > hid rather than revealed moral reality. The boy’s inarticulate but > honest testimony, by contrast, points to the central fact of the case: > the dragon is bad; it destroys people. This is also the basic truth > about human senescence. > > *(7) * *Failure to appreciate the urgency.* Until very late in the > story, nobody fully realized what was at stake. Only as the king was > staring into the bloodied face of the young pleading man does the > extent of the tragedy sink in. Searching for a cure for aging is not > just a nice thing that we should perhaps one day get around to. It is > an urgent, screaming moral imperative. The sooner we start a focused > research program, the sooner we will get results. It matters if we get > the cure in 25 years rather than in 24 years: a population greater > than that of Canada would die as a result. In this matter, time equals > life, at a rate of approximately 70 lives per minute. With the meter > ticking at such a furious rate, we should stop faffing about. > > *(8) * *“And in the coming days… I believe we have some reorganization > to do\!”* The king and his people will face some major challenges when > they recover from their celebration. Their society has been so > conditioned and deformed by the presence of the dragon that a > frightening void now exists. They will have to work creatively, on > both an individual and a societal level, to develop conditions that > will keep lives flourishingly dynamic and meaningful beyond the > accustomed three-score-years-and-ten. Luckily, the human spirit is > good at adapting. Another issue that they may eventually confront is > overpopulation. Maybe people will have to learn to have children later > and less frequently. Maybe they can find ways to sustain a larger > population by using more efficient technology. Maybe they will one day > develop spaceships and begin to colonize the cosmos. We can leave, for > now, the long-lived fable people to grapple with these new challenges, > while we try to make some progress in our own > adventure.[\[4\]](#_ftn4) > >   > > > > [](#_ftnref1) > > \[1\] > > Calorie restriction (a diet low in calories but high in nutrients) > extends maximal lifespan and delays the onset of age-related illnesses > in all species that have been tested. Preliminary results from an > ongoing study on rhesus and squirrel monkeys show similar effects. It > seems quite likely that calorie restriction would work for our species > too. Few humans, however, would be willing to put themselves through a > lifelong hunger-diet. Some researchers are searching for > calorie-restriction mimetics – compounds that elicit the desirable > effects of lowered caloric intake without us having to go hungry. (See > e.g. Lane, M. et al. (1999) “Nutritional modulation of aging in > nonhuman primates,” *J. Nutr. Health & Aging*, 3(2): 69-76.) > > [\[2\]](#_ftnref2) A recent straw poll at the 10th Congress of the > International Association of Biomedical Gerontology revealed that the > majority of the participants thought it either probable or “not > improbable” that comprehensive functional rejuvenation of middle-aged > mice would be possible within 10-20 years (de Grey, A. (2004), “Report > of open discussion on the future of life extension research,” (Annals > NY Acad. Sci., 1019, in press)). See also e.g. de Grey, A., B. Ames, > et al. (2002) “Time to talk SENS: critiquing the immutability of human > aging,” *Increasing Healthy Life Span: Conventional Measures and > Slowing the Innate Aging Process: Ninth Congress of the International > Association of Biomedical Gerontology*, ed. D. Harman (Annals NY Acad. > Sci. 959: 452-462); and Freitas Jr., R. A., *Nanomedicine, Vol. 1* > (Landes Bioscience: Georgetown, TX, 1999). > > [\[3\]](#_ftnref3) See, e.g. Kass, L. (2003) “Ageless Bodies, Happy > Souls: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Perfection,” *The New > Atlantis*, 1. > > [](#_ftnref4) > > \[4\] > > I’m grateful to many people for comments on earlier drafts, including > especially Heather Bradshaw, Roger Crisp, Aubrey de Grey, Katrien > Devolder, Joel Garreau, John Harris, Andrea Landfried, Toby Ord, Susan > Rogers, Julian Savulescu, Ian Watson, and Kip Werking. I am also very > grateful to Adi Berman, Pierino Forno, Didier Coeurnelle, and others > who have translated the fable into other languages, and everybody who > has helped spread the word or who have given encouragement. Thank > you\!