2018-02-23 18:58:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
created_at: '2014-12-23T02:38:24.000Z'
|
|
|
|
|
title: How Good Was Napoleon? (2007)
|
|
|
|
|
url: http://www.historytoday.com/jonathon-riley/how-good-was-napoleon
|
|
|
|
|
author: diodorus
|
|
|
|
|
points: 104
|
|
|
|
|
story_text: ''
|
|
|
|
|
comment_text:
|
|
|
|
|
num_comments: 79
|
|
|
|
|
story_id:
|
|
|
|
|
story_title:
|
|
|
|
|
story_url:
|
|
|
|
|
parent_id:
|
|
|
|
|
created_at_i: 1419302304
|
|
|
|
|
_tags:
|
|
|
|
|
- story
|
|
|
|
|
- author_diodorus
|
|
|
|
|
- story_8786550
|
|
|
|
|
objectID: '8786550'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
2018-03-03 09:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
![Surrender of Madrid (Gros), 1808. Napoleon enters Spain's capital
|
|
|
|
|
during the Peninsular
|
|
|
|
|
War](//www.historytoday.com/sites/default/files/napoleon_madrid.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
"Surrender of Madrid (Gros), 1808. Napoleon enters Spain's capital during the Peninsular War")By
|
|
|
|
|
1805, the year that Napoleon became sole head of state and supreme
|
|
|
|
|
warlord of France, the notion of strategy was recognizably modern. Joly
|
|
|
|
|
de Maizeroy had written in Théories de la Guerre (1777): ‘Strategy ...
|
|
|
|
|
combines time, places, means, various interests and considers all ...
|
|
|
|
|
\[Tactics\] reduces easily to firm rules, because it is entirely
|
|
|
|
|
geometrical like fortification.’ Achieving strategic objectives through
|
|
|
|
|
means as diverse as diplomacy, economic power, information warfare and
|
|
|
|
|
military power is not too far from this line of thought. The sort of
|
|
|
|
|
strategy practised by Napoleon, his allies and some of his opponents,
|
|
|
|
|
should be distinguished from that of his implacable enemy, Britain. Its
|
|
|
|
|
worldwide empire, economic base, and naval reach, all meant that it was
|
|
|
|
|
able to conduct strategy through other means than military power.
|
|
|
|
|
Revolutionary and imperial France was not in this position – it had to
|
|
|
|
|
use military force not in addition to the other instruments of national
|
|
|
|
|
power, but in order to access them. Military power for Napoleon must be
|
|
|
|
|
seen therefore as diplomacy, not merely, as in the Clausewitzian sense,
|
|
|
|
|
an addition to it.
|