2018-02-23 18:58:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
created_at: '2017-01-06T03:41:42.000Z'
|
|
|
|
|
title: 'John Berger: Drawing is discovery (1953)'
|
|
|
|
|
url: http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/art-and-design/2013/05/john-berger-drawing-discovery
|
|
|
|
|
author: Thevet
|
|
|
|
|
points: 63
|
|
|
|
|
story_text:
|
|
|
|
|
comment_text:
|
|
|
|
|
num_comments: 7
|
|
|
|
|
story_id:
|
|
|
|
|
story_title:
|
|
|
|
|
story_url:
|
|
|
|
|
parent_id:
|
|
|
|
|
created_at_i: 1483674102
|
|
|
|
|
_tags:
|
|
|
|
|
- story
|
|
|
|
|
- author_Thevet
|
|
|
|
|
- story_13333737
|
|
|
|
|
objectID: '13333737'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
2018-03-03 09:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
For the artist drawing is discovery. And that is not just a slick
|
|
|
|
|
phrase, it is quite literally true. It is the actual act of drawing that
|
|
|
|
|
forces the artist to look at the object in front of him, to dissect it
|
|
|
|
|
in his mind’s eye and put it together again; or, if he is drawing from
|
|
|
|
|
memory, that forces him to dredge his own mind, to discover the content
|
|
|
|
|
of his own store of past observations.
|
2018-02-23 18:19:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-03 09:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
It is a platitude in the teaching of drawing that the heart of the
|
|
|
|
|
matter lies in the specific process of looking. A line, an area of tone,
|
|
|
|
|
is not really important because it records what you have seen, but
|
|
|
|
|
because of what it will lead you on to see. Following up its logic in
|
|
|
|
|
order to check its accuracy, you find confirmation or denial in the
|
|
|
|
|
object itself or in your memory of it. Each confirmation or denial
|
|
|
|
|
brings you closer to the object, until finally you are, as it were,
|
|
|
|
|
inside it: the contours you have drawn no longer marking the edge of
|
|
|
|
|
what you have seen but the edge of what you have become. Perhaps that
|
|
|
|
|
sounds needlessly metaphysical. Another way of putting it would be to
|
|
|
|
|
say that each mark you make on the paper is a stepping stone from which
|
|
|
|
|
you proceed to the next, until you have crossed your subject as though
|
|
|
|
|
it were a river, have put it behind you.
|
2018-02-23 18:19:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-03 09:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is quite different from the later process of painting a “finished”
|
|
|
|
|
canvas or carving a statue. Here you do not pass through your subject,
|
|
|
|
|
but try to recreate it and house yourself in it. Each brush-mark or
|
|
|
|
|
chisel-stroke is no longer a stepping stone, but a stone to be fitted
|
|
|
|
|
into a planned edifice. A drawing is an autobiographical record of one’s
|
|
|
|
|
discovery of an event – either seen, remembered or imagined. A
|
|
|
|
|
“finished” work is an attempt to construct an event in itself. It is
|
|
|
|
|
significant in this respect that only when the artist gained a
|
|
|
|
|
relatively high standard of individual “autobiographical” freedom, did
|
|
|
|
|
drawings as we now understand them begin to exist. In a hieratic,
|
|
|
|
|
anonymous tradition they are unnecessary. (I should perhaps point out
|
|
|
|
|
here that I am talking about working drawings – although a working
|
|
|
|
|
drawing need not necessarily be made for a specific project. I do not
|
|
|
|
|
mean linear designs, illustrations, caricatures, certain portraits or
|
|
|
|
|
graphic works which may be “finished” productions in their own right.)
|
2018-02-23 18:19:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-03 09:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A number of technical factors often enlarge this distinction between a
|
|
|
|
|
working drawing and a “finished” work: the longer time needed to paint a
|
|
|
|
|
canvas or carve a block; the larger scale of the job; the problem of
|
|
|
|
|
simultaneously managing colour, quality of pigment, tone, texture,
|
|
|
|
|
grain, and so on – the “shorthand” of drawing is relatively simple and
|
|
|
|
|
direct. But nevertheless the fundamental distinction is in the working
|
|
|
|
|
of the artist’s mind. A drawing is essentially a private work, related
|
|
|
|
|
only to the artist’s own needs; a “finished” statue or canvas is
|
|
|
|
|
essentially a public, presented work – related far more directly to the
|
|
|
|
|
demands of communication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It follows from this that there is an equal distinction from the point
|
|
|
|
|
of view of the spectator. In front of a painting or statue he tends to
|
|
|
|
|
identify himself with the subject, to interpret the images for their own
|
|
|
|
|
sake; in front of a drawing he identifies himself with the artist, using
|
|
|
|
|
the images to gain the conscious experience of seeing as though through
|
|
|
|
|
the artist’s own eyes. It is this which explains why painters always
|
|
|
|
|
value so highly the drawings of the masters they admire and why the
|
|
|
|
|
general public find it so difficult to appreciate drawings – except for
|
|
|
|
|
sentimental reasons, or in so far as they are impressed by purely manual
|
|
|
|
|
dexterity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All this is prompted by the exhibition of 500 Old Master drawings
|
|
|
|
|
(Pisanello to Ingres) now at Burlington House. The distinction I have
|
|
|
|
|
tried to make is relevant for on it are based the standards with which
|
|
|
|
|
one approaches such a show. A few of the works – the Rowlandsons and the
|
|
|
|
|
portrait of Gentile Bellini by Giovanni for instance – come under the
|
|
|
|
|
category of “finished” works. Most, however, can be called “working”
|
|
|
|
|
drawings. In appreciating these, deftness, charm, ingenuity are, in
|
|
|
|
|
themselves, beside the point. Everything originally depends upon the
|
|
|
|
|
quality of discovery. Mannerisms, however elegant, are barriers to
|
|
|
|
|
discovery as clichés are barriers to thought; look, for instance, at the
|
|
|
|
|
Pietro Longhis and some (not all) of the younger Tiepolos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, by contrast, go to the Raphael Head of a Muse and feel how he
|
|
|
|
|
discovered the fullness of the form growing under his hand like a pot on
|
|
|
|
|
a wheel; how Dürer discovered the direction of every fold and fissure as
|
|
|
|
|
though he were reading Braille, how Guercino discovered the sensuality
|
|
|
|
|
of his Venus as though he were sleeping with her, how Guardi discovered
|
|
|
|
|
the space of a room as though he were filling it with air from a pair of
|
|
|
|
|
bellows; how Rembrandt discovered his figures as though encompassing
|
|
|
|
|
them with the knowledge of a father. In every case one senses their
|
|
|
|
|
surprise.
|