hn-classics/_stories/2008/4736061.md

---
created_at: '2012-11-03T06:25:55.000Z'
title: Now 0-for-3, SpaceX's Elon Musk Vows to Make Orbit (2008)
url: http://www.wired.com/science/space/news/2008/08/musk_qa
author: 6ren
points: 73
story_text: ''
comment_text: 
num_comments: 40
story_id: 
story_title: 
story_url: 
parent_id: 
created_at_i: 1351923955
_tags:
- story
- author_6ren
- story_4736061
objectID: '4736061'
year: 2008

---
[![](https://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/archive/images/article/full/2008/08/elon_musk_630px.jpg)](https://www.wired.com/science/space/news/2008/08/#)

Elon Musk
[briansolis/flickr](http://flickr.com/photos/briansolis/2685130533/)

The third time was definitely not a charm for SpaceX.

The spaceflight company run by PayPal founder Elon Musk suffered its
third high-profile mishap Saturday when an undisclosed problem caused a
rocket launch to fail. The light-lift Falcon 1 was lost after its two
stages failed to

separate during the launch from the Kwajalein Atoll in the central
Pacific Ocean.

Also lost were a Department of Defense satellite, two NASA satellites
and the ashes of 208 people, including astronaut Gordon Cooper and James
Doohan, the actor who played Scotty in the original Star Trek television
show, [according to The New York
Times](http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/science/space/03launchweb.html?ref=science).

Wired.com spoke with Musk about SpaceX's string of setbacks, the power
of patience and the future of privately funded spaceflight.

**Wired.com:** What happened up there Saturday?

**Elon Musk:** We're not quite ready to release details on the initial
investigation yet, but we should do it very soon. We think we have a
very good idea but I don't want to get ahead of ourselves and then be
wrong. We definitely know where the problem occurred, but 'why?' is the
question. We think we know, but have to be sure. We think it's very
small and will require a tiny change, so tiny that if we had another
rocket on the pad we could launch tomorrow.

**Wired.com:** You always emphasize testing and testing and more
testing, and you've been super careful to make sure everything is right
before launching. So what's the disconnect – why do things still go
wrong?

**Musk:** Some things can only be tested in space. Bear in mind, Falcon
1 is our test vehicle. The reason we started with F1 isn't because I'm
passionate about launching small satellites, but because I want to make
mistakes on a small scale and not a large one. And this doesn't appear
to be a quality issue or a manufacturing issue. It's a design issue
related to new hardware that has only flown on this flight. It was our
first with the new Merlin 1C regeneratively cooled engine. The problem
we think we've identified is a lesson learned and thus we won't make it
on the big Falcon 9, and in that sense it's helpful.

**Wired.com:** Your whole mantra is "cheaper and more reliable." But so
far you're zero for three, which is anything but cheap and reliable, and
guys like GlobalSecurity.org's John Pike say the reason it has taken
billions of dollars and tens of thousands of people to successfully
launch rockets is physics, not some new design or economic model.

**Musk:** Guys like John Pike have existed since the dawn of time, and
if you listen to people like that then things will never get better,
never change. It's a false point of view. Yes, we need to put some
rockets into orbit. But the first order of business is to get rid of
design errors, which we're doing, and once those are eliminated then
you're dealing with repeatability, and people should judge what we're
doing from the point of view of all the design issues we've ironed out
through these F1 test flights.

**Wired.com:** You've been quoted many times saying you had enough money
for three unsuccessful flights, and then ...

**Musk:** That was the dumbest thing I've ever said. I meant that after
three unsuccessful flights we might be abandoned by our customers – if
they abandoned us I couldn't see how it would work. But that has turned
out not to be the case. We've gained customers between missions and so
it would be silly to abandon the business when we have 12 flights ahead
of us.

**Wired.com:** But you're about to formally announce SpaceX's first
outside investment?

**Musk:** Yes, we took an investment from the Founder's Fund, a fund run
by a bunch of guys I used to work with at PayPal. They've been
interested in SpaceX for a long time and I knew that, and thought it
might be smart to take an investment from them to increase our war chest
in case something didn't go right on flight three. Which turned out to
be true.

**Wired.com:** At the end of the day you're still zero for three; you
have so far failed to put a rocket into orbit.

**Musk:** We haven't gotten into orbit, true, but we've made
considerable progress. If it's an all-or-nothing proposition then we've
failed. But it's not all or nothing. We must get to orbit eventually,
and we will. It might take us one, two or three more tries, but we will.
We will make it work.

**Wired.com:** How do you maintain your optimism?

**Musk:** Do I sound optimistic?

**Wired.com:** Yeah, you always do.

**Musk:** Optimism, pessimism, fuck that; we're going to make it happen.
As God is my bloody witness, I'm hell-bent on making it work.

**Wired.com:** So what have you learned so far?

**Musk:** Patience is a virtue, and I'm learning patience. It's a tough
lesson.